What permits would a person have to get to be able to hand out flyers
similar to what is done at a polling place on election day. These flyers
showing information and URLs for the demonstration of interference as well
as the arguments here about the competition and possible financial failure
of investments.
Just my 2 cents,
73, de Jim KG0KP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
To: <rfi@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2004 9:33 AM
Subject: RE: [RFI] BPL
>
> It COULD be useful to observe and report to the conferees -- if that were
> even possible (hah!) -- interference to reception of stations such as WWV
> and coastal and marine stations. Such an immediate and public
> demonstration that BPL causes harmful interference (and to a US government
> service) would go far to offset the "big lie"technique industry spokesmen
> seem to be using. However, as has been pointed out elsewhere here, the
> circumstances are not likely to allow monitoring a BPL system in
operation,
> let alone presenting any such observations to the conference.
>
> Failing that, knowing people will be assembled whom we need to reach, it
> might be possible to contact them directly -- politely, diplomatically and
> with no fanfare at all -- to offset BPL propaganda. That goes, I think,
> well beyond what most individual Amateurs could do; we haven't got the
> industry contacts. And considering the immoderate tone of some of our
> comrades' remarks, that's a good thing!
>
> Cortland Richmond
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Hare,Ed, W1RFI <w1rfi@arrl.org>
> > [snip]
> > Do you think those 100 hams that converged on the BPL site with their
> mobile stations could say with a straight face that this was "normal
> amateur operating?" If they did, does anyone think that the BPL industry,
> the utilities or the FCC would believe them?
> >
> > Any talk about intentionally disrupting BPL systems is harmful. There is
> no place for such vigilante approaches in trying to deal with BPL
> interference. Even these discussions do not reflect well on the amateur
> radio service.
> > [unsnip]
> > 73,
> > Ed Hare, W1RFI
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|