To: | rfi@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RFI] Why we badly need "party line" materials for all hams |
From: | Mike Coslo <mcoslo@adelphia.net> |
Date: | Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:38:44 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
Dave Bernstein wrote:Hi Dave,I disagree, Ed. Senior management can create a single integrated team tasked with winning this war. Educating the ham community, and providing them with continuously up-to-date information would be a critical responsibility for this team. Once they are up to speed, there will be few questions or issues they can't efficiently handle. I unfamiliar with the ARRL's internal organization, but my experience is that the classic functional model that serves organizations well when they're in equilibrium often gets in the way during times of rapid change. Whoever is driving ARRL's anti-BPL effort should be empowered to set the strategy and execute every dimension of it. Your "not my bailiwick" comment implied that you lacked this authority, which is what triggered my suggestion. Why don't you call ARRL, and make your sugestion. Better yet, when you call them, volunteer to do this thing. If you don't want to do it through the ARRL, then set yourself up as a clearinghouse. Would you volunteer to head up such an effort? - Mike KB3EIA -
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] Why we badly need "party line" materials for all hams, Tom Rauch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Fwd: [RFI] re Clicks in Speaker, KenK1ZYW |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [RFI] Why we badly need "party line" materials for all hams, Dave Bernstein |
Next by Thread: | RE: [RFI] Why we badly need "party line" materials for all hams, Dave Bernstein |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |