Just curious.
Did the pilot project do any testing with hams? Did they test near a
home station?
Many BPL pilot projects have involved hams at the start only to ignore
their results later when it didn't come out so good. That's why I'm
curious about the testing performed.
I have heard that Current is one of the better ones, but not totally
clean.
73, de ed -K0iL
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Rosenberg
Two weeks ago, the Nemours Hospital ("the Mayo Clinic for Pediatrics")
and JEA (formerly the Jacksonville Electric Authority, now including
the water utility in addition to being the electricity provider) made
a
presentation of their BPL implementation at NTIA here in Washington,
DC. NTIA funded this small pilot project, which uses BPL as the
communications technology for the Nemours staff to monitor pediatric
asthma patients in their home.
The program itself is quite impressive in its scope, simplicity and
success. The hospital is to be commended for the work they are
doing. See
http://www.nemours.org/internet?url=no/news/releases/2005/050325_home_mo
nitoring_broadband.html
Also to be commended is the JEA, who took the right approach in their
BPL implementation. The JEA has an extensive and very robust fiber
network that ties their substations together. The BPL system uses BPL
as the home-to-substation link, after which it ties into the fiber
network for distribution to the hospital.
During the Q&A I asked the JEA program manager a couple of questions:
how extensively had they researched the BPL vendors; what criteria did
they used to award the contract; and how they saw saw BPL in the
market
place.
The answers were quite good. JEA looked long and hard at all the BPL
vendors and chose Current (the same as those who are going into
Dallas). Their basic criteria was to identify a BPL provider who had
a
solid financial standing, a product that worked and worked well, and a
strong customer support mechanism. Understanding that the JEA program
manager is not in the marketing department, the comments on why the
JEA
opted for BPL had a different slant. The potential revenues for JEA
from a commercial BPL service are relatively small, considering the
cheap competition. JEA is interested in BPL for their own system
management purposes, and found that it is significantly less expensive
to implement and operate than their present wireless system, which, if
I remember correctly, is a combination of CDPD and other LMR/Cellular
systems. With BPL, they can read meters and manage their systems far
more easily and efficiently.
What was most impressive is that before they began to look at vendors,
they went to the amateur radio and public safety community to
understand the issues of those communities and integrate their issues
into their criteria for awarding the equipment and system
contract. They impressed me as a being a smart business that did not
like surprises!
What was most interesting to me is that is that the comments regarding
their outreach were made as part of the presentation, and not as a
result of questions (there are only three other hams at NTIA, one of
whom was at this briefing).
In the end, I was impressed. As I've said, both sides of the project
are commendable -- medical and technical. It proved to me that if
the
system operator is responsible and designs their system properly, and
holds the vendor to a high standard, BPL and amateur radio can
co-exist.
73,
Eric W3DQ
Washington, DC
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:8.5pt'>This e-mail contains
Omaha Public Power District's confidential and proprietary information
and is for use only by the intended recipient. Unless explicitly
stated otherwise, this e-mail is not a contract offer, amendment, nor
acceptance. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified
that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in
reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited.</p>
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.3/209 - Release Date:
12/21/2005
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.3/209 - Release Date:
12/21/2005