Your posting is the first one to be really objectionable.
CFLs are an interesting discussion topic if you consider that breakage is
a hazardous waste event and the manufacturing process is not as
environmental friendly event either. Additionally their usage may cause
an EMI problem also.
73, Don, W6YN
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:52:19 -0700 "Bob Gates" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> I'll tell you what's a sad commentary. This forum is for the
> discussion of
> RFI. AND ONLY RFI RELTATED ISSUES. WILL ALL OF YOU SO INCLINED TO
> THE STATE OF THE WORLD PLEASE TAKE YOUR DISCUSSIONS ELSEWHERE?
> THAT INCLUDES ABORTION, IRAQ, BUSH, THE DEFICIT, PMS, AND EVERY
> NON-RELATED SUBJECT. IF I WANTED TO LISTEN TO ALL THIS CRAP I WOULD
> Thank you,
> Bob, W7BJ
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David C. Hallam" <email@example.com>
> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 9:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [RFI] CFL bulbs - NO WAY
> > It's a sad commentary on the current state of discourse in our
> > country
> > that due to political correctness we come to see any that form of
> > dissent to a person's position on an issue is viewed as a personal
> > It is also a sad commentary on the usurping of state's rights by a
> > government's elected representatives whose primary objective is to
> > reelected as opposed to serving the best interests of those who
> > them. I do not single out any one political party over another on
> > matter.
> > David
> > KC2JD/4
RFI mailing list