RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] CFL's & UV - Hoax or Real? Real but Overstated?

Subject: Re: [RFI] CFL's & UV - Hoax or Real? Real but Overstated?
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:42:50 -0500
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>

kd4e wrote:
> The claim of the researchers is 10x+ the UV radiation of a typical
> incandescent.
>   

If it's 10 the average incandescent it'd take some very sensitive 
equipment to even know it's there.
IOW, just scare tactics.  Even the big tubes close up give off very 
little.  I have 22 8' tubes in my shop and I don't even have a sun tan.

73

Roger (K8RI)
> I had trouble with the audio so could not make out a lot of the
> details.
>
>   
>> Well, I'm not going to watch a video, but here's a link to the FDA's page of
>> information on CFLs:
>>
>> http://www.fda.gov/CDRH/radhealth/products/cfl.html
>>
>> which says:
>>
>> "
>> Do CFLs emit UV?
>>
>> All fluorescent lamps emit some UV. Typical fluorescent lamps, including
>> CFLs, which consumers would encounter, emit very low levels of UV. In order
>> to measure any UV radiation from these lamps, very sensitive measuring
>> equipment must be used."
>> 73
>> Dan
>>   
>>     
>
>
>   
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>