Thanks Dale,
Those links appear to be from corporate sources with a vested financial
interest in discouraging concerns. History suggests that corporate
press releases sometimes overstate or under-state things.
Especially where the chronically quality-challenged and safety-
threatening totalitarian Chinese manufacturing-military system is
involved no presumption of quality or safety is justified.
I look forward to an independent study of the various products
and manufacturing lots for hard measurements - alongside an independent
evaluation of the percentage of citizens who may have a higher-than-average
sensitivity to whatever form of UV is emitted at close-range and if they
may
be at risk.
Unlike Al "Chicken-Little" Gore I prefer to be informed by science
rather
than proof-texting selectively.
Thanks again for the links - they are part of the larger puzzle.
> Dale Martin wrote:
>
>
> This from
> http://www.gelighting.com/na/home_lighting/ask_us/faq_compact.htm#hazardous_
> uv
>
>
> From
> http://energystar.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/energystar.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.ph
> p?p_faqid=3867
>
--
Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E
FS/Swap/Wanted: http://kd4e.com/swapn.html
Free OS : http://www.PuppyLinux.com
Personal: http://kd4e.com
|_|___|_|
| | & | |
/\ {|
/ \ {|
/ \ {|
/ @ \ {|
| |~_|~~~~|
| -| | |
============\ # KD4E
Have an http://ultrafidian.com day!
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|