To: | "'RFI List'" <rfi@contesting.com>, <tvi-rfi-emi@mailman.qth.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RFI] [TVI-RFI-EMI] CFL's & UV - Hoax or Real? Real butOverstated? |
From: | "Howard Lester" <hlester@dakotacom.net> |
Reply-to: | Howard Lester <hlester@dakotacom.net> |
Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:10:08 -0700 |
List-post: | <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
From: "Dale Martin" > As for "citizens who may have a higher-than-average sensitivity to > whatever > form of UV is emitted at close-range", maybe they should sit farther away > from the UV source? Yes: at least *we* know that "the inverse-square law" is our friend. Howard N7SO _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] [TVI-RFI-EMI] CFL's & UV - Hoax or Real? Real but Overstated?, Dale Martin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RFI] CFL's & UV - Hoax or Real? Real butOverstated?, kd4e |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFI] [TVI-RFI-EMI] CFL's & UV - Hoax or Real? Real but Overstated?, Dale Martin |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RFI] CFL's & UV - Hoax or Real? Real butOverstated?, kd4e |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |