On 01/02/2013 06:08 PM, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
Thanks for all the info. That makes great sense. I've been using an MFJ
RFI detector which gets me in the neighborhood and I need something that
gets me closer. I was considering a hokey ultrasonic detector (I was
going to repurpose a kid's "Spy Ear") or a ~400MHz AM receiver and a
directional antenna at the same frequency.
I use an MFJ-856 (the one with the 3 element beam) as my primary
location tool. To make it more useful, I added a 3 step attenuator
and modified the unit to get the receiver out of the center of the
yagi and clean up the yagi pattern a little. That unit alone gets me
to 80% of the poles. In some cases there is still too much
ambiguity. I use 445 MHz to resolve most of those down to a single
pole. So far I've only found one case where the two units have not
led me to a precise pole identification (135 MHz leaves too much
ambiguity about which pole it is and 445 MHz hears nothing).
Good luck!
73,
Paul N1BUG
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|