Jim,
Actually, you are correct in the sense that the R-56 grounding guidelines are
not based on circuit board designs, but they are based on real world problems
and experience on lightning protection at commercial transmitter comm sites so
a different set of "circuit fundamentals" are applied for a different signal
source. As they say, one size doesn't always fit all for differing electrical
circuits. AC power circuits are based on different fundamentals from RF
circuits or from audio circuits depending on the signal used. And RF ground is
different from AC safety ground, etc...
Motorola expanded their original R56 guidelines from around 50 pages to 518
pages in 2000 in response to repeated equipment failures at radio sites related
to poor installation practices when following their old R56 booklet. Lightning
is not equivalent to a DC circuit or even a more complex signal like an audio
or data circuit. Lightning protection, as I understand it, is based on
creating a single current path with the lowest possible "impedance" for a
lightning strike covering from DC to RF energy.
The theory is "daisy-chaining" or series connections that create multiple
connections on each device can create impedance "bumps" increasing overall
impedance all along the chain. Even if only two wires are connected to the
exact same point on a device, it is considered a "multiple-connection", i.e.
more than one conductor/wire making contact. Lightning will find the path of
least impedance (not least resistance) so these little impedance bumps might
cause the lightning path to go somewhere unexpected like through some portion
of the devices' circuit boards instead of the desired path. This is especially
true if the multiple ground wires are incorrectly connected to multiple
locations on the same device leaving a new possible path through the device's
circuits instead of around it.
Another problem with daisy-chaining in commercial set-ups is what happens when
a technician temporarily removes one of the devices in the middle of the
daisy-chain for repairs. The result is most of the other devices are left
unprotected until the missing device is returned to service. You just cannot
predict what service techs will do on a given day, but especially on a Friday!
;-)
When Single-Point grounding is done correctly, it will greatly reduce (but not
eliminate) the chance of lightning damage to equipment that operates 24-7.
Motorola expanded use of single point grounding requirements with Motorola's
R-56 in 2000 (updated in 2005) which can be found on-line at this link: (see
Chapter 5 section 5.4.1 page 5-33,34 for specific daisy-chain info):
http://www.radioandtrunking.com/downloads/motorola/R56_2005_manual.pdf
M/A Com (back in 2001) also had or has a shorter 56 page version (ironically
numbered), but also requires single-point grounding that meets the National
Electric Code (NEC). (See
http://www.repeater-builder.com/ge/lbi-library/t4618r3a.pdf see section 1.5.1)
(Note: The M/A Com guide still refers to use of an internal comm room "Halo"
which has been abandoned by most vendors today.) I believe NEC also forbids
multiple wire connections (similar to daisy-chaining) for safety reasons in
electrical circuits.
All that being said, I'll repeat what I said originally: The typical or simple
ham radio station can probably get away with some very short-runs of
daisy-chaining (especially on computers) since most hams have human-operated
layers of lightning protection such as disconnecting all antennas and grounding
all the cables at the entry port during possible thunderstorm periods. If a
ham does all that, he reduces his risk of the daisy-chaining having any impact.
On the other hand, a multi-multi contest station should probably employ the
same single-point grounding standards that the commercial guys do whenever
possible. Also, I would not daisy-chain computers and RF devices together, but
keep them separate if at all possible. Physical equipment layout to separate
RF devices from computers would make this possible. I keep my computers on
station left and RF on station right or middle with cable entry from the right.
QST has had some good primer articles on lightning protection and grounding for
ham shacks: a search for lightning in ARRL's Periodicals Archive found an
article in 2002, June & July. I know there are others more recent.
73, de ed -K0iL
-----Original Message-----
From: RFI [mailto:rfi-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 4:20 PM
To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II
On 12/19/2013 1:39 PM, EDWARDS, EDDIE J wrote:
> But for anything connected to RF equipment, daisy chaining violates the
> "guidelines" and specs for single-point grounding systems. This may be
> acceptable as long as the overall shack has proper lightning protection in
> all other cases.
That is NOT correct. These so-called guidelines are based on a
misunderstanding of circuit fundamentals.
73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail contains Omaha Public Power District's confidential and proprietary
information and is for use only by the intended recipient. Unless explicitly
stated otherwise, this e-mail is not a contract offer, amendment, or
acceptance. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that
disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|