| To: | rfi@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFI] Resolving RFI to a DSL Modem |
| From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
| Date: | Sat, 21 Mar 2015 14:55:43 -0700 |
| List-post: | <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
On Sat,3/21/2015 9:06 AM, Adrian Flynn wrote: Why not use "Snap on Chokes"? Put as many in series as needed. Because snap-ons with a single turn have a low Q (broad) self resonant (lossy peak) in the VHF spectrum, and are inductive in the 1-3 MHz range used by DSL. this makes them ineffective at these frequencies. We're looking for a high value of resistance, not inductance. Study k9yc.com/RFI-Ham.pdf 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] Resolving RFI to a DSL Modem, Jim Brown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFI] RFI in CyberPower 1400VA / 840Watts UPS, Randy Farmer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFI] Resolving RFI to a DSL Modem, David Robbins |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFI] Resolving RFI to a DSL Modem, Kim Elmore |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |