>From the pictures, the testing was not in free space, nor in an RF test
>chamber, therefore, there will be reflection both from the ground as well as
>any nearby objects which will effect the polarization of signals at the
>receiving antenna.
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 13, 2017, at 2:42 PM, Lee STRAHAN <k7tjr@msn.com> wrote:
>
> So Tom,
> Am I reading your data correctly, I see only a 9.7 dB difference as the
> loop is rotated from broadside to inline with the vertical source in the
> first two columns of A and B. Or am I missing something? My Eznec models of
> loops show at low angles a near perfect null for vertical polarized signals
> broadside to the loop and a near perfect null for horizontal polarized signal
> inline with the loop? As in your A and B tests .
> Lee K7TJR OR
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFI [mailto:rfi-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tom Thompson
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:19 PM
> To: rfi@contesting.com Contesting <RFI@contesting.com>
> Subject: [RFI] Antenna Polarization Tests
>
> Some of you have mentioned in the past about using a tuned loop for tracking
> RFI. A question has sometimes arose about the direction of the null of the
> loop. Larry Benko, W0QE, and I did some polarity tests using various
> orientations of both the transmitting short dipole and a receiving loop and a
> receiving short dipole. The results are shown here:
>
> http://tomthompson.com/radio/AntennaPolarization/Antenna%20Polarization%20Measurements.html
>
>
>
> 73, Tom W0IVJ
>
> PS Sorry for the wrong word before
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|