Jim and others,
I believe the problem has much to do with the cable from the DLSAM to
the customer which over the years has been upgraded to be "data"
compliant. I think this means more twists per inch and different twist
patterns between the various pairs in the cable. There is no getting
this cable changed easily. I believe this is a major contributor to why
some areas have less uplink VDSL2 interference. We were able to follow
the VDSL2 uplink interference along these cables back to the DSLAM with
the levels decreasing as we got further away from the subscriber (cable
loss).
I would be willing to bet that when the initial VDSL2 tests were being
done the link between the DSLAM and the customer was not done with 50
year old cable but I have no solid evidence of this.
Larry, W0QE
On 7/16/2017 11:22 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
On 7/16/2017 6:52 AM, David Robbins wrote:
And complaining to AT&T about something that might be their problem
and that
their techs have no idea how to find or fix won't help.
Although I haven't experienced this problem, W0IVJ and W0QE have
documented it quite well. I strongly suspect that it is a simple "Pin
One Problem" in the defective equipment (probably the DSL or cable
modem, but also in the CATV or DSL distro system). If so, it can
probably be suppressed a lot by ferrite chokes on cables connected to
the defective equipment. Chokes should be wound using the guidelines
in my "Choke Cookbook" for the frequencies where the noise is heard.
It's part of k9yc.com/RFI-Ham.pdf
73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|