[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] 5bwas rtty

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] 5bwas rtty
From: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 09:44:28 -0500 (CDT)
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On Tue, 11 May 2004, Ian White, G3SEK wrote:

-> Peter Laws wrote:
-> >Is it because I don't use fancy QSL label software
-> More likely the reason is that *they* use a computerized system, that is
-> set up to produce one card per station, and they simply didn't notice
-> that you needed one card per band.

I don't care if it's one card/QSO or just a label with all the QSOs as
long as all the QSOs I QSLed are CFMd!  Certainly one card is cheaper.

-> Every card, both sides...?  Beyond a certain point, the more you write,
-> the less likely people are to read it.

I went through my logs and found the stations that I had on 3, 4, or 5
bands and sent one card to each listing all QSOs.  All cards had notes on
the front that there were more QSOs on the back.

-> They might have got the message better if you'd written it just once, on
-> a bright yellow Post-it.

Maybe this is a better strategy - thanks!

Peter Laws
RTTY mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>