RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] SCC RTTY

To: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>, RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] SCC RTTY
From: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 10:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
THIS DISCUSSION (BOARING ALREADY) HAS NOTHING TO DO WTIH SCC RTTY CONTEST RULES.
UNLESS FOR SOMEONE WHO DOES NOT PARTICIPATE (JUST BLA BLA BLA...:) 
ANDREI EW1AR-NC2N

Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/27/05, VE3FH [R] wrote:
> Not anymore, we have a single piece of paper here since April 2000.
> 73,
> Julio VE3FH


Huh. Well, I thought that was a more sensible way to go. Seems to me
if there was a lifetime operator's permit it would save a lot of
hassle and retesting and then if you wanted to operate a station,
you'd just apply for a renewable station license (which most of us
would do, clearly). That way, if you ever went inactive, your station
license would lapse, but not your permit and if you wanted to operate
again, you'd just re-apply for a station license.

Is it still easy to get multiple station licenses up there (for summer
cottage, etc)?


-- 
Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train!

'They that can give up essential Liberty to
obtain a little temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety." - Ben Franklin
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>