----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
To: "'George Henry'" <ka3hsw@earthlink.net>; <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments
> Interference is not the only reason to refer a signal to the Commission
> seeking enforcement action. Unless you are advocating that the Amateur
> Service be turned into a quasi-commercial mobile service or a vehicle
> for secure communications to serve terrorists and drug runners, your
> position has no logical foundation. Any argument against freely
> available monitoring software is specious and morally bankrupt.
>
All I have ever argued was that there is no legitimate, and, as someone else
pointed out, legal grounds
for the FCC to require software developers to make their wares available for
free, which is in fact what you advocated in one of your earlier messages:
>Since the original language was mine ...
> "Freely available" is downloadable from a central site or available
> for the cost of postage and media.
End of discussion.
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|