Here is my email request to Joe Carcia concerning the ARRL plan to QSY from
1817.500 kc to 1807.500 kc. It's the last post I'm going to make on the
subject. Either you take the initiative to try and stop the move or when it
occurs don't complain. I suspect that the response from the digital
community will be anemic as most don't operate on 160 meters. However if the
QSY was to 14070 kc there would be more of an uproar.
Joe,
As an ARRL member in good standing I'm advising you that it is a very bad
idea to QSY W1AW operations from 1817.500 kc to 1807.500 kc beginning on
April 3rd, 2006. 1807.500 kc +/- 3 kc is a main and very active frequency
slice for weak signal PSK31, MFSK16, OLIVIA MFSK and RTTY digital
operations. W1AW operation there would wipe out this main meeting frequency
and more.
On 160 meters the ARRL band plan calls for digital modes between 1800-1810
kc and CW between 1800-2000 kc, so it makes no sense to begin operation on
1807.500 kc. If you do the math it's 10 kc for digital modes and 200 kc for
CW.
I'm an avid CW operator too and I'm aware of the pressure the 160 meter CW
DX community has been putting on your 1817.500 kc operations. But the
solution to that issue is not to QSY down to 1807.500 kc. Please reconsider
your frequency choice.
--... ...--,
Thomas F. Giella, KN4LF
Lakeland, FL, USA
Grid Square EL97AW
kn4lf@arrl.net
KN4LF Amateur & SWL Radio History: http://www.kn4lf.com
KN4LF 160 Meter Propagation Theory Notes: http://www.kn4lf.com/kn4lf8.htm
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.0/269 - Release Date: 2/24/2006
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|