RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse...

To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse...
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Reply-to: dezrat@copper.net
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 06:26:25 -0700
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:14:59 -0400, you wrote:


>That's fine ... ask the sponsors to create a new class for those who 
>do not want to compete in the unlimited class.  Boxing started as one 
>class, the little guys got together to create their own classes when 
>they found they could not compete with the bug boys.  You will still 
>find an occasional boxer who moves up a class if he really wants to 
>"go for it."  
>
>CQ (I think it was) has created the triband-wires class in several of 
>their contests ... they are not very popular of competitive.  Many 
>triband equipped stations still compete in the traditional single 
>operator class be cause that's where the competition is.  
>
>Again, there is nothing that prohibits anyone from publishing a 
>list of "handicapped" results or lobbying the contest sponsors for 
>more classes but be prepared to come up with the support for the 
>added awards and administrative costs.  
>
>73, 
>
>   ... Joe, W4TV 
>   

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

Agreed. As I recall, the "TS" class addresses mainly antennas, not
radios. Correct me if I am wrong. 

Bill, W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>