RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse
From: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Reply-to: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@pclink.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 10:26:00 -0500
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Steve,

"Come here lookin' fer trouble, eh, pard'ner?"  :-)

If a mode can be done on *one* transceiver, IMO it's SO1R. That's still a 
*simplex* configuration in my eyes. You can't rx and tx at the same time.

I chose to use the simplex and duplex analogies because it is already a 
recognized distinction between two (old, well established) technologies. It 
also solves the problem of classifying the new "2 in 1" radios. If you can 
tx/rx simultaneously, you effectively have two radios, whether they are one or 
two physical boxes.

73 de Bob - K0RC


Message: 4
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:37:27 -0500
From: "Steve Lenaghan VE4LR" <VE4LR@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Message-ID: <NGBBLIFKFINKDCHDBPBNIECDDOAA.VE4LR@arrl.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Simple question, would MultiPSK Panoramic RTTY mode be SO2R?  

It does allow multiple reception all be it in the audio band pass.

RYRY 73 Steve VE4LR
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>