RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Anarts exchanges

To: "RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Anarts exchanges
From: "Vladimir V. Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Reply-to: "Vladimir V. Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:25:53 +0100
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Claude,

You might also wish to check my RTTY article in the April-May 2007 issue of
the TCA Magazine. There is quite an extended discussion there concerning
topics you rise.

Thanks and 73,

Vladimir VE3IAE

--- 



> Hello Phil and the group.
> Thanks for your reply.
> I think I had all my macros setted properly.
> I have learned by monitoring PROs and wondering why
> they do this and that. You article in RSGB is a good way
> to learn how to do.
>
> The problem was  that I have never saw a RTTY contest with
> so many funny macros.
>
> I like to follow the rules, if the rules say the exchange is
> RST, TIME and CQ ZONE I will send it in this order if possible
> with my software of course. No problem with N1MM.
>
> How about the time, everybody know we should only send the
> four digits, as 2345 not 23:45:00Z  anyway had no problem
> inserting it in the box...
>
> The worst thing are callers that send my call 2 or even 3 times
> before giving me hiscall...  it is so easy to only send only
> (de VE2FK VE2FK or even add one hi)
>
> At the end the (TU) say it all I think, Thank you, you are logged
> and 73. I had some guys sending TU, TNX 73 and why not
> GL and SK...
>
> I dont use the TU {NAME}  anymore except for some friends with
> a special macro.
>
> I dont understand why not more guys use the ENTER to begin
> a macro.
>
> Well, if all those funny macros were because there is lot of new
> guys around... BRAVO    more fun to come.
>
> 73 de Claude  VE2FK
>
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Phil Cooper
>   To: Claude Du Berger ; RTTY
>   Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 3:43 PM
>   Subject: Re: [RTTY] Anarts exchanges
>
>
>   Claude VE2FK wrote:
>
>   "I was not sure anymore if I was
>   correct to call a station with only (de VE2FK VE2FK)
>   I was not sure if I should as many  use (UR) and (BK)
>   I was not sure if I should only send my UTC as 2345
>   I was not sure if I should forget the rules and send
>   my CQ Zone before the TIME...
>   I was not sure if I should CFM with the received exch.
>   I was not sure if I should repeat the received station
>   call and say TU plus TNX and 73 at the end...
>   I was wondering why I have {ENTER} to begin a macro
>   and only a SPACE at the end..."
>
>   I almost always use DE GU0SUP GU0SUP GU0SUP only, as the other guy
usually
>   knows his own callsign!
>   Sending the call twice can result in corruption, and if only sent twice,
can
>   cause confusion.
>   In ANARTS, I had DE K4FX K0FX. This caused me a lot of confusion, as I
>   didn't recognise K4FX, but I do know K0FX! It turned out to be K4FX.
>
>   UR and BK can be used. It is up to you, but is - I guess - a waste of
time.
>   You know the other guy has finished when the carrier drops, so BK isn't
>   really needed. I use VE2FK TU (CLAUDE) 599 14 1234 1234 GU0SUP
>   The TU is my "thankyou" to you.
>
>   The TIME UTC and CQ ZONE are also software dependent. Writelog inputs
the
>   ZONE for you, and you can change it if necessary, and most of us know
what
>   to expect. The one real variable is the time.
>   I sent 14 1234 1234, but saw many variants, such as:
>   UR RST 5NN
>   THE TIME IS 12:34:54UTC
>   MY CQ ZONE IS CQ14
>   Which was a bit over the top!
>   Writelog is OK with most time formats, but didn't like the UTC
immediately
>   after the seconds. When I clicked on it, it put the first two digits
into
>   the ZONE field. If there was a space, it was OK.
>   Having said all that, 2345 is fine!
>   Sending order isn't so important, as we know what is what, and again, it
can
>   be software dependent, as per the email from Tom regarding N1MM.
Writelog
>   has the fields in the order requested.
>
>   How you respond is up to you, and how you want to play it. Some folk
want to
>   win, and set out to win, or at least to try. I am only there to have
fun,
>   maybe give out a mult, or maybe a new DXCC.
>   I realise I won't win, and therefore, my replies may be a bit more
verbose.
>   However, it is nice to see a greeting, a TU and/or a 73 at the end.
>
>   The ENTER and SPACE bit is to do with how it looks on screen.
>   If you don't have the enter at the beginning, your callsign can easily
get
>   lost in the jumble of letters on screen, and will likely be on the same
>   line.
>   Putting an ENTER at the start makes the Rx side put your callsign on a
new
>   line.
>   I usually have an ENTER at the end too, but it is down to personal
>   preference as to whether you have a SPACE or ENTER.
>   If you don't have either, then what can happen is that I see VE2F and
the
>   carrier drops before it can decode the last letter. Now, if I have
missed
>   the first part of your DE VE2FK VE2FK, then I may log you with the wrong
>   call.
>
>   One thing that wasn't mentioned is how to end CQ calls. In most
contests,
>   you often see DE VE2FK VE2FK PSE K and you then have to wait and see if
>   VE2FK is calling someone else.
>   I would much prefer to see CQ or TEST at the end of each CQ, or the end
of
>   the TU QRZ?
>   There was a lot of HISCALL TU QRZ? type calls in this contest, and you
then
>   have to wait and see what the call is. On a few occasions, I had to wait
>   several overs to see who it really was.
>   I saw this at least twice:
>   CQ'er: TU QRZ?
>   Caller: DE GU0SUP GU0SUP
>   CQ'er: GU0SUP 599 14 1234
>   Caller: TU 599 14 1234
>   CQ'er: TU QRZ?
>   Eh??? In the end, I sent WRU? and finally got the call.
>
>   Send whatever you are comfortable with. Please be prepared to change
your
>   macro to suit conditions too.
>   If you keep getting asked for repeats of one part of the exchange, then
why
>   not add one more instance of that part of the exchange?
>   I also have a macro that sends just the required bit once. If it is QSB,
>   then I will hit that key as many times as needed to get it across.
>   Often, folk will want JUST that part. Do not send the whole exchange
again,
>   as it isn't needed, and can lead to yet another repeat if QSB hits the
same
>   bit.
>   Most times in ANARTS, the zone wasn't in doubt, it was the time.
>
>   But, whatever you do, HAVE FUN!
>   And here endeth the lesson!
>
>   73 all
>   Phil GU0SUP
>
>   _______________________________________________
>   RTTY mailing list
>   RTTY@contesting.com
>   http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>