RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Post-contest edit of Cabrillo file?

To: stevehaines@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Post-contest edit of Cabrillo file?
From: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:10:16 -0400
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
At 04:20 PM 6/12/2007, you wrote:
>I'm a complete newcomer to RTTY and computer logging (N1MM). My modest
>effort in the ANARTS contest -- all 25 QSOs -- was very enjoyable,
>considering my 25 watts to a 20 meter ground plane!

As one of those 25 you worked, I can say the new multiplier credit 
you gave me during the last hour of the contest was also "very enjoyable" here.


>If the "heat of battle" (if the phrase applies to a rate of 2 QSO's per
>hour!) I got confused between the manual transmit button on the 757, the
>mouse, the function keys, and the shifting focus of the open windows on
>the computer. I dorked up two QSO's trying to edit one, and re-entered
>both manually.
>
>Now, after I sent my Cabrillo file to patleeper@optus.com.au, I
>discovered that the raw data is in my computer in a text file for each
>of the two days -- I had turned on the "record to file" feature in
>either N1MM or MMTTY. As I scrolled around, I found the two QSOs with
>CX4AAJ and LT0H. I had reversed the time stamps and the time exchanges
>with the two contacts. Thus I suppose they will lose credit for the QSO
>and the multiplier. I don't think there was another ZP in the contest.<SNIP>
>Steve Haines ZP9EH

You have found your own error - you didn't use some external source 
to provide information about the QSOs that you didn't already have. 
You should edit your submission to make it correct and re-submit it.

patleeper... is the address I sent mine to this morning, but have not 
received any kind of acknowledgement yet.

Thanks again for the QSO.

Jerry W4UK SC

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>