RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] SO1U Re: CQ-Contest SO2R (Longish,but (I think) Scintillatin

To: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>,"John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] SO1U Re: CQ-Contest SO2R (Longish,but (I think) Scintillating)
From: "sjolin" <sjolin@swbell.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:17:26 -0500
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Bill, why don't you create a website and post all you want about SO2R, pros 
and cons. This is getting tiring. Do you really think you are going to 
change anyone's mind, one way or the other? This is just mental masturbation 
pretending to be debate.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>
To: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>
Cc: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] SO1U Re: CQ-Contest SO2R (Longish,but (I think) 
Scintillating)


> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:50:36 -0400, "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Whatever tools the winners are using, within the
>>rules mind you, some people will be trying to limit.
>
> ------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------
>
> I can't believe you said that, John. Nobody wants to limit SO2R. We
> just believe it is fair to have separate SO1R and SO2R classes. Feel
> free to enter which ever you like.
>
> Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty 

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>