ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:42:42 -0400, "J.G.Castellano"
<caste@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>Sorry but that is not a valid argument, with that line of reasoning they can
>argue that they can't afford narrow filters to copy CW and we have to stay
>clear 4 or 5kHz on each side.
------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------
Sorry, but my sorry is sorrier than your sorry. The argument is valid.
With your analogy, we would have to make room for guys with crystal
sets. A +/- 250 Hz spacing is good enough.
73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|