If you're really hardcore, delete him from your log, submit your
log. He'll get a NIL and a penalty. If he checks his LCR, maybe
he'll remember the conversation. Maybe he'll change his approach
and/or maybe he'll never work you in a contest again.
73,
Hank, W6SX
At 01:56 PM 25 03 2008, Stephen J Carroll wrote:
>Well, let's just say I'm "blowing the whistle" on a few individuals
>(although I won't mention any names/callsigns). During the contest, on
>more than one occasion, the exchange DID NOT include the RST (599). In
>my mind, this should be an invalid contact... both for the SENDING and
>RECEIVING stations. I even mentioned it to one individual, and he/she
>thought it was a big joke and proceeded to keep going without ever
>sending the RST portion. What is the general thought on this matter?
>Overlook it, or should the individual(s) entry not be scored and
>submitted as a 'check log' ? I kept going back to listen to this
>particular station and found it interesting that NOBODY else mentioned
>the absence of RST.
>
>I'm just hardcore for RULES... by withholding the RST, that creates an
>unfair advantage in favor of that station (shorter exchange).
>
>Maybe I just need to get off my soapbox, huh?
>
>73, Steve - AA$U
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|