RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange

To: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: dezrat1242@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:11:31 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I didn't notice this at all. To me, the confirmation is either QSL or
TU, and I wait for one or the other on every QSO. During the recent
contest I don't believe I had a single QSO without receiving one or
the other. Are you (Roger) looking for something more than that?

And I agree totally about the 599. Complete waste of time on RTTY. In
a CW or phone contest it does have some value because it sets the
rhythm and tone for the report which follows, but RTTY has no such
need. I think it's just a carryover from other contests.

73, Bill W6WRT


------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------


On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:55:47 +0000 (GMT), Roger Cooke
<g3ldi@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>, it really was amazing how many stations did not stay around for confirmation
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>