Hello Peter,
Yes and no , depend from situation but normally not needed three times ,
only two is o.k.
if I can not copy , I can not copy also 5 or 7 times not.
If everybody start using "longer is better" theory we just get a full
band with callers and
no listeners, right.
No, I think tray with two first . Normal OP asking for partial call to
repeat or, if no partial, asking QRZ?
or wait for next call or some other callers after You. I think for good
signal two is o.k. for a little
bad propogation also two is o.k. , only on 80 band in static crash QRM
preferable is three.
So, that my "theory" :-)
73
Vilnis / YL2KF
Peter Laws wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 16:44, Vilnis YL2KF <yl2kf@arrl.net> wrote:
>
>
>> So, three times call sounds stupid, agree,
>>
>
>
> If you receive N5UWY and N9UWY, which is correct?
>
> If you receive N5UWY, N9UWY, and N5UWY, which is correct?
>
> Three is better than two.
>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|