Ian I agree with the way you do it and that is how I have set it up
here. My thinking was to make it like you would for a SSB contest.
VE3JI 599 04 C0 KT0DX would make more sense then VE3JI 599 04 CO VE3JI
if someone was to run across it when doing S&P.
Steve
KT0DX
Amos, Ian wrote:
> Ah there is the difference .... I use the reply (HISCALL) exchange (MYCALL).
> This reason I do this as it let others know I am the run station so they
> stick around to work me or can move on faster if that have already logged me.
> As usual there are many different styles of operating to be used
>
> 73, Ian VE3JI
>
> ________________________________
> From: Claude Du Berger [mailto:duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:14 AM
> To: Amos, Ian; rtty@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY contest questions and comments
>
> When I am in RUN-CQ mode, I always reply with (Hiscall) exch. (Hiscall)
> because If there are many callers, QRM, it is important to confirm to
> whom I have sent the exchange. ex: Hiscall 599 001 001 Hiscall
> Then, I confirm with (TU Hiscall de MYCALL CQ) Why send it again...
> Already sent twice...
>
> 73, Claude VE2FK
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Amos, Ian<mailto:ian.amos@sap.com>
> To: rtty@contesting.com<mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:00 AM
> Subject: [RTTY] RTTY contest questions and comments
>
> I agree with Bill the CALL TU helps me make sure I have the QSO, as I have
> been caught a few times. This a little slower but I believe it improves my
> log accuracy overall.
>
> Ian
> VE3JI
>
>
>
>
>> Another comment..... after the exchange it helps band sweepers if you send
>> TU N6PE or QSL N6PE instead of N6PE TU or N6PE QSL because they can move as
>> soon as they see the T or the Q
>>
>
> REPLY:
>
> I do it as N6PE TU because often there will be two stations, both of whom
> think
> they worked me. If I do the TU first, they will both be gone, but only one is
> really in the log. Sending the call sign first gives them both a look at who I
> really logged.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com<mailto:RTTY@contesting.com>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|