ok now this is weird. I have the same operation as K0RC reported,
ie. pressing one macro button (F key) immediately truncates the
already running message and starts with the new one. I also
'used to' be able to string macros together and they would chain.
Probably a setup somewhere that allows one operation or the
other.
Now that I know it can work again, I'll sit and run through the
combinations.
I use plain old com port keying so not confined to microkeyer
based systems. (and also on latest REV N1MM)
Mark n2qt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean Cavanaugh" <seanc@unixgeeks.ca>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY contest questions and commenk, ts
I use N1MM and used this feature extensively. I have macros for MYCALL,
HISCALL and EXCH separately, and just hit the appropriate function key
however many times you want. You just assemble your message out of the
available components, kind of like those fridge magnets with words on
them. It takes very little time to get used to it and then you don't
have to worry about making mistakes while editing your messages on the fly.
My N1MM was updated to the latest as of Friday afternoon, so it hasn't
been changed lately. It worked the same last year as well as in the RU
and WPX contests.
73,
Sean - VA5LF
On 09/30/2009 11:45 AM, Robert Chudek - K0RC wrote:
> QSL the intention of your remark Jerry...
>
> Until this past weekend I believe I was able to string macros together as
> you said. But for this contest I setup a MO2T network at KØIR's qth using
> N1MM. There was an issue when trying to string macros together where the
> next key pressed immediately truncated the previous macro.
>
> I need to investigate "what changed" or "how come". One difference is that
> the MO2T station is using MicroKeyer interfaces and my station does not.
> It's also possible that something has changed in the N1MM software
> recently.
>
> My workaround was to watch the outgoing message and press the next macro
> key
> before the TX dropped. This wasn't very elegant and required paying
> attention and good timing..
>
> 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jerry Flanders"<jeflanders@comcast.net>
> To: "Robert Chudek - K0RC"<k0rc@citlink.net>; "Amos, Ian"
> <ian.amos@sap.com>; "Claude Du Berger"
> <duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net>;<rtty@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 12:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY contest questions and comments
>
>
> No - not editing on the fly - assembling the
> transmitted string from several macros on the
> fly. If my f2 has "HISCALL 599 05 05 SC SC " and
> my f4 has " W4UK " and my f5 has HISCALL, I have
> the choice of sending f2 with no calls at the end
> (for when condx are good but also busy), adding
> my call under normal condx, or adding his call if
> I think that is best. I do this with combinations
> of f2, f4, and f5. If I hit f5 while f2 is still
> playing, they go out as one string.
>
> I gave a more detailed report of how this works
> and the exact macros I use here yesterday.
>
> Will N1MM (or other programs) let you make up one
> long transmitted string by pressing one macro
> button and then another before the first plays out? It is incredibly
> useful.
>
> Jerry W4UK
>
> At 12:24 PM 9/30/2009, Robert Chudek - K0RC wrote:
>> Yes, you can edit macros "on the fly" in N1MM
>> Logger. (Right click on any macro button.)
>>
>> When I make a RTTY contesting presentation, I
>> make a point about changing bands (80m vs. 20m),
>> changing propagation (a pipeline vs. signals in
>> the noise), and even the portion of the contest
>> (beginning vs. end) make a difference in the most effective macros.
>>
>> As a RTTY operator gains contesting experience,
>> they will learn to change the macro content to
>> optimize for the current conditions. Macros
>> should not be chiseled in stone! Editing them
>> only takes a few seconds. I queue up a couple of
>> CQ's and make my changes during that period of time.
>>
>> 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Flanders"
>> <jeflanders@comcast.net>
>> To: "Amos, Ian"<ian.amos@sap.com>; "Claude Du
>> Berger"<duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net>;<rtty@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:07 AM
>> Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY contest questions and comments
>>
>>
>>> But different conditions would favor different variations. I think
>>> one macro for (HISCALL exchange) and then separate macros containing
>>> only (HISCALL) and (MYCALL) give the most flexibility. Then just put
>>> them together (or even leave out the last call for some Qs) at tx time.
>>>
>>> Don't all contest programs allow macros to be "assembled" from
>>> different function keys on the fly? Maybe n1mm does not?
>>>
>>> Jerry W4UK
>>>
>>> At 10:23 AM 9/30/2009, Amos, Ian wrote:
>>>> Ah there is the difference .... I use the reply (HISCALL) exchange
>>>> (MYCALL). This reason I do this as it let others know I am the run
>>>> station so they stick around to work me or can move on faster if
>>>> that have already logged me. As usual there are many different
>>>> styles of operating to be used
>>>>
>>>> 73, Ian VE3JI
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: Claude Du Berger [mailto:duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:14 AM
>>>> To: Amos, Ian; rtty@contesting.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY contest questions and comments
>>>>
>>>> When I am in RUN-CQ mode, I always reply with (Hiscall) exch.
>>>> (Hiscall)
>>>> because If there are many callers, QRM, it is important to confirm to
>>>> whom I have sent the exchange. ex: Hiscall 599 001 001 Hiscall
>>>> Then, I confirm with (TU Hiscall de MYCALL CQ) Why send it again...
>>>> Already sent twice...
>>>>
>>>> 73, Claude VE2FK
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Amos, Ian<mailto:ian.amos@sap.com>
>>>> To: rtty@contesting.com<mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:00 AM
>>>> Subject: [RTTY] RTTY contest questions and comments
>>>>
>>>> I agree with Bill the CALL TU helps me make sure I have the QSO, as
>>>> I have been caught a few times. This a little slower but I believe
>>>> it improves my log accuracy overall.
>>>>
>>>> Ian
>>>> VE3JI
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Another comment..... after the exchange it helps band sweepers if
>>>> you send TU N6PE or QSL N6PE instead of N6PE TU or N6PE QSL because
>>>> they can move as soon as they see the T or the Q
>>>>
>>>> REPLY:
>>>>
>>>> I do it as N6PE TU because often there will be two stations, both of
>>>> whom think
>>>> they worked me. If I do the TU first, they
>>>> will both be gone, but only one is
>>>> really in the log. Sending the call sign first
>>>> gives them both a look at who I
>>>> really logged.
>>>>
>>>> 73, Bill W6WRT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RTTY mailing list
>>>> RTTY@contesting.com<mailto:RTTY@contesting.com>
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RTTY mailing list
>>>> RTTY@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RTTY mailing list
>>> RTTY@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|