Agreed and well said Robert!
73
Jim W7RY
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests
>I am consistently amazed by the negative comments why a 160 meter RTTY
> contest would be a "bad thing". If we had only listened to the nay-sayers
> in
> the past we would still be using spark. In the early days, the entire MF
> and
> above radio spectrum was dismissed as a "wasteland" with no particular
> value. And since when has 160 meters been an exclusive use band for CW, or
> Phone, or bulletins, or rag-chewing?
>
> Apparently the pioneering spirited, inquisitive minds, and experimenters
> have all died off with the generations of hams prior to us. A pity.
>
> WAS on 160 meter RTTY is not impossible. It is a challenge. Working all 50
> states on 160 meters from a city lot is not impossible. It is a challenge.
> I
> did it on CW and I didn't even have a 160 meter antenna! There is
> absolutely
> no reason why it cannot be done on RTTY as well.
>
> My original comments regarding adding 160 meter RTTY to the contest line
> up
> are still valid. But I will clarify that I believe an exclusive single
> band
> event would be the optimum "configuration" to add a new challenge for the
> RTTY community to enjoy.
>
> 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.37/2466 - Release Date: 10/28/09
19:39:00
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|