ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 12:36:59 -0600, "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
>One of Chen's earlier comments closed with essentially - do it (a contest)
>and then we would have data. I think that was early on the best point of
>this exchange.
>
>Having a RTTY contest on 160m one time would determine, in a single weekend,
>answers to all these points of debate - the impact of MP, the ability to
>catch some DX, how much interference there is with other Q activity, and
>most of all - allow the actual participation interest to be determined
>empirically.
REPLY:
Agreed, and I especially liked his suggestion to encourage SWL entries, and I
would really like to see the SWL logs posted. They could be very informative.
73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|