RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Cheating

To: "'Cheryl Whitlock'" <cherwhit@gmail.com>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Cheating
From: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:49:59 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Not all SO2 ops do this and there are lots of frequencies especially on CW. 


CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1
W0MU.NET or  67.40.148.194

"A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may
never get over." Ben Franklin 



-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Cheryl Whitlock
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 2:20 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Cheating

I respectfully disagree Joe. SO2R operators sit on both frequencies and keep
other operators off both of them. Regardless which of the two frequencies I
try, I will get told the frequency is in use.

Cheryl, AA4YL



On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV <lists@subich.com> wrote:

>
>  > I think SO2R should be in a class by itself. IN ALL CONTESTES... Or  
> > lump it together with some multi class.
>
> No! When used properly SO2R is nothing more than a way to change bands 
> quickly.  If the operator has the hardware and skill to to that 
> legally there is nothing wrong with SO2R.  If the operator lacks skill 
> (and ethical compass) to use the hardware within the rules, report 
> him/her to the contest sponsors for the necessary action.
>
> There is no justification for treating one set of SINGLE OPERATORS any 
> differently from any others based only on the hardware located in 
> their stations.
>
> 73,
>
>    ... Joe, W4TV
>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>