RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] Fwd: RST in contests

To: RTTY reflector <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] Fwd: RST in contests
From: John Merrill <johnn1jm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:16:23 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>

Begin forwarded message:

> From: John Merrill <johnn1jm@gmail.com>
> Date: March 21, 2011 8:08:29 AM MST
> To: dezrat1242@yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] RST in contests
> 
> I agree and someone should blow the whistle to the contest chairman on those 
> that don't do it for disqualification. :-)
> 
> 
> On Mar 21, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Bill, W6WRT wrote:
> 
>> In yesterday's BARTG contest there seemed to be an unusually large
>> number of stations who did not send an RST in their exchange. Often
>> there will be one, maybe two, but yesterday there were six or seven. 
>> 
>> Since I was not making a serious, all-out effort in the contest I
>> decided to let it go and just log what they sent and assume 599. I'm
>> starting to think that was the wrong thing to do. 
>> 
>> Frankly, I would like to see the signal report eliminated from all RTTY
>> contests, but as long as it is in the rules, the rules should be obeyed.
>> As others have pointed out, RST does serve some purpose in CW and SSB
>> contests by way of setting the tone and rhythm for what follows, but in
>> RTTY that is not relevant. 
>> 
>> For the next contest I am going to create a macro that says 
>> RST? RST? and send it when needed.
>> 
>> What do you folks think?
>> 
>> 73, Bill W6WRT
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>