RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] USB-Serial

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] USB-Serial
From: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Reply-to: k0rc@citlink.net
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:29:14 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Hello Pete,

The most effective solution is to use a software driver called EXTFSK. 
This removes the need to find an "old" USB/Serial converter to run FSK 
at 45 baud. Using this software driver with MMTTY allows just about any 
modern USB/Serial device to work. There is an issue though, to ensure 
the USB/Serial converter works it's best to find a device based upon the 
FTDI chip set (as opposed to the Prolific chip set).

Here's a link to the FTDI site: http://www.ftdichip.com/FTProducts.htm

Make certain the converter you purchase says it uses the FTDI chipset 
and driver. The Prolific chipset "might" work, but it's a crap shoot, 
depending upon its age and software driver.

So there's two pieces to the puzzle... Using the EXTFSK software driver 
with MMTTY and using an FTDI based converter for the hardware connection.

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN

------------------------------------------------------------------------


On 6/13/2011 11:14 AM, peter.jackson17@ntlworld.com wrote:
> Hi I know this has been on the reflector many times but the old memory cells 
> are getting past their sell by date. What's the model of the usb to serial 
> converter that works with rtty. I know the cheapo ones don't like the slow 
> baud rate and 5 data bits.
> My on board graphics failed at the weekend during the contest on my main 
> computer so it would be a good idea if I have a backup system using my laptop.
> Thanks in advance, 73 Pete G3KNU
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>