RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Re the 10m RTTY contest

To: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>, "'RTTY Contesting'" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Re the 10m RTTY contest
From: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:19:31 -0900
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Humm, let me think.  Challenge or Fun?  Since much of day to day life is a 
challenge in and of itself, I vote for FUN!  That being said, the challenge 
of running this contest at 100W from AK with a half height tower due to the 
wind was more than offset by the fun of having 10M alive and well again. 
Had this inaugural contest been held last year I think I would have had more 
fun trying to poke a grizzly bear out of its den!

Thanks for the new contest Don and Ed.  Oh, and thanks too for the spots 
Don, always appreciated.

73,
Gary AL9A

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
To: "'RTTY Contesting'" <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: December 05, 2011 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Re the 10m RTTY contest


> It's OK to run high power and submit a log as CHECKLOG.  I thought about 
> doing it myself since I knew I was going to be a CHECKLOG,
> but decided against it because high power on 10 meters kills the telephone 
> part of my UVerse and the wife would have killed me.  I
> think running low power is more challenging although running high power is 
> probably more fun.
>
> 73, Don AA5AU
> http://www.aa5au.com
> http://www.rttycontesting.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On 
> Behalf Of Phil Cooper
> Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 2:38 PM
> To: 'RTTY Contesting'
> Subject: [RTTY] Re the 10m RTTY contest
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've just seen the 3830 summary for this contest, and I am a little 
> puzzled.....
> The rules clearly state (3.) 100 watts output maximum.
>
> And yet, some have put themselves into the HP category!
> I am assuming they thought that as there is no QRP category, or only ONE 
> power level, they would use the HP section in the 3830
> form?
>
> But, having said that, I suspect that several stations were using a bit 
> more than 100 watts.
> I heard several EU/AS stations that were so loud they had copyable signals 
> above and below their Tx frequency. Maybe overdriven AFSK
> can account for that as well, but these stations were end-stopping on the 
> meter, whereas most folk were S6 - S9.
>
> Over the past months, I have found it better to reduce output power, 
> especially when CQ'ing. In WAEDC and CQWW, I was down to around
> 50 or 60W out, and in this one, I ran at about 70 watts, apart from 
> calling the VP2 and the PJ2, for which I pushed out the full
> 100!
>
> Just my thoughts.....................
>
> 73 all
>
> Phil GU0SUP
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
> Virus Database (VPS): 111205-0, 05/12/2011 Tested on: 05/12/2011 20:38:24 
> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2011 AVAST Software.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty 

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>