RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] K3 reduced-bandwidth RTTY analysis

To: RTTY Mailing List <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] K3 reduced-bandwidth RTTY analysis
From: "aflowers@frontiernet.net" <aflowers@frontiernet.net>
Reply-to: "aflowers@frontiernet.net" <aflowers@frontiernet.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Hello again,
 
I have finally gotten around to finishing up a short analysis of the 
reduced-bandwidth FSK keying in the K3.  As many of you are aware, Elecraft 
made some beta firmware available several weeks ago that attempts to reduce the 
clicks that result for unshaped keying.  They analysis involves a before and 
after pictures comparing the FSK spectra from the general release firmware 
(representative of most radios, to the best of my limited knowledge) and the 
bandwidth-reduced firmware.  I've also included some analysis using a 300 
Hz "roofing filter" to measure the noise floor at different dial offsets from 
the transmitter to give and idea of what it "feels" like when it is QRM.  There 
are a few people who operated WPX and and other contests with this firmware, 
and I am sure they could tell of their experiences on the transmitter side.
 
http://www.frontiernet.net/~aflowers/k3beta/
 
While on the subject of clicks, spurs, and other nasty things, I also would 
encourage people to have a look at N2QT's question on p. 55 in the April QST 
and WB1GCM's (at ARRL Lab) response, which also address this and some other 
issues around RTTY keying.  He distinguishes "clicks" that result from the 
waveform from the other bad things that can happen with broken audio signal 
chains.  This is an important distinction to keep in mind.
 
Enjoy!
 
Andy K0SM/2
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>