To: | rtty@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] contest change |
From: | Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net> |
Reply-to: | k0rc@citlink.net |
Date: | Sat, 06 Jul 2013 00:22:54 -0500 |
List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
This is still wrong. In your example 6+0=6 you are counting hours. The
suggested new rule requires a count of two off times. There is only one
off time in 6+0=6.
73 de Bob - KØRC in MN ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 7/5/2013 11:50 PM, Al Kozakiewicz wrote: 1+1=2 6+0=6 QED Al AB2ZY -----Original Message----- From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bill Turner Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2013 12:01 AM To: RTTY Reflector Subject: Re: [RTTY] contest change ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 20:42:43 -0400, Al wrote:One of those longest 2 blocks could well be of zero length.REPLY: I thought we got rid of the New Math. One plus zero equals two? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [RTTY] Fwd: Re: contest change, Michael Haack |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Fwd: Re: contest change, Jim W7RY |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] contest change, Al Kozakiewicz |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] contest change, Jim W7RY |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |