I agree not sending RST when required by the rules makes the contact
invalid, but...
Most logging programs will automatically fill in the 599 for each QSO. If
we work one of these short cut artists should we then delete the default 599
entry and submit the log with the missing field? That will render the QSO
invalid for my log, but what about his? If he is logging 599 for each QSO
without actually sending the numbers, who corrects his log? If he isn't
sending the RST on each entry the entire log should be disallowed, but how
will the contest sponsors determine this?
73,
Gary AL9A
-----Original Message-----
From: John Merrill
Sent: August 18, 2013 11:31 AM
To: Don Hill AA5AU
Cc: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RST SARTG RTTY
I had 2. One of them is a frequent participant high scoring rtty contester.
I asked 4 times for RST before he finally figured it out. I suspect he
might of had a guest operator. When I came across him later on he was still
not giving RST. The second one ignored me and startred calling CQ again.
Must of ticked him off :-).
73, John N1JM
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Don Hill AA5AU <aa5au@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Didn't get any of those this time, but yes, they are not valid contacts
without RST.
73, Don AA5AU
-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of John Merrill
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 11:28 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: [RTTY] RST SARTG RTTY
Couple of stations not sending RST with the exchange. Isn't that against
the rules?
73, John N1JM
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|