RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 135, Issue 33

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 135, Issue 33
From: Dave Vandaveer <dave@rockisland.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 19:54:34 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Tom,

Sailmail uses the SSB HF transceiver on the boat in the authorized marine bands and not in the ham bands. It is meant for those that won't go to the bother of getting a ham license. The similar program for the Ham Bands is Airmail, and that is given away free to anyone in the ham community. Airmail uses the winlink system in the ham bands and there is no charge for that. Definitely not trying for profit in the ham bands.

Dave   K9MRQ

Message: 6
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:45:36 -0700
From: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Band Plan
        proposal
Message-ID: <53278920.1030805@frontier.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

On 3/17/2014 3:58 PM, John Becker wrote:
>
>   * Given that the unattended digital stations are in violation of part
> 97 by passing commercial traffic
>
> This is interesting in that most of my time is devoted to pactor I'm yet
> to see this on any ham
> band.

There was a guy who posted here just today that the author of SailMail,
"has to maintain land based stations for Sailmail and charges just
enough to cover the costs incurred.  It is definitely not a profit
making situation."

Sounds like someone is charging to use the ham bands.  73
Tom W7WHY

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>