RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Question

To: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Question
From: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 13:41:24 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
In addition to Bill's comments, too many RTTY signals are rotten. Too
wide--often caused by hams over driving transmit for AFSK.

73,

Hank, W6SX


On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com> wrote:

> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:          (may be snipped)
>
> On 5/17/2014 1:22 PM, Fred Souto Maior wrote:
>
>> Can someone pse tell me how many kcs are used by a RTTY signal ??
>> This is relative to people operating split and receiving up 1 Khz.
>> Usually the TX frequency of the DX station is QRMed by the callers
>> just 1 and some times less then 1 up. And if we have a local stn calling
>> it's impossible to get a decent signal from the DX. Why not put the RX
>> frequency 2 or 3 up ??
>>
>> Fred - PY7ZZ
>>
>
> REPLY:
>
> For an amateur RTTY signal with 170 Hz shift, the transmitted bandwidth is
> about 300 Hz, or .3 kHz.  The problem you mention above happens because
> many ops use a receive bandwidth much wider than that and the supposed QRM
> results.  A split of 1 full kHz is more than enough when using a narrower
> receiver bandwidth.
>
> Also, a very strong station 1 kHz away can desense your receiver if it
> does not have an appropriate roofing filter. This is not really "QRM" but
> rather inadequate receiver performance.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> dezrat@outlook.com
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>