sir you have made your point(many times) please take it else where
There are , and have many been been many things that that the arrl has
done and and are doing that I did not, and do not like---however your
ranting and raving about a separate issue , is really non related, and
is counter productive to fighting their RM proposal ...
if this is such an (personal) issue with you, please take it to another
reflector under another issue.. there is a lot of truth about "divide
and conquer" and this is exactly what you are doing however well
meaning, with the PRIMARY
thrust of the RM issue.
please keep focused on defeating the Rm thing. how simple is that???
73 john w8wej
On 6/10/2014 19:30, W0MU wrote:
Why do we keep having to cover or make excuses for rule violations?
For the record I am complaining about the willful interference by the
ARRL W1AW control operators. The bulletins and code practice are
quite legal. Willful interference is not.
On 6/10/2014 11:23 AM, Kok Chen wrote:
On Jun 10, 2014, at 9:32 AM, Paul Stoetzer wrote:
You are one of about two people in the world complaining about the
ARRL's bulletin service.
This is really no different from the NCDXF beacons, which by
gentlemen's agreement operate at known fixed frequencies. (And there
are probably also at least two people in the world who complain about
them.)
If you are near 14100 kHz and a beacon fires up, it may legally be
interfering with you, but it is for the good of the community that
you don't operate there. We avoid the beacon frequencies even
though, just like the case for W1AW, the NCDXF beacons are no longer
very useful in the internet age (think WSPR).
You can see the statement from NCDXF regarding interference here:
http://www.ncdxf.org/beacon/beaconinterference.html
Just treat the NCDXF and W1AW frequencies as part of a general band
plan.
Indeed, as a low power operator, I would rather know precisely where
W1AW might fire up and avoid those frequencies, rather than have them
QSY from known frequencies and land on top of me when they attempt to
avoid interfering with some other station. More likely than not, I am
too weak for W1AW to hear me.
73
Chen, W7AY
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4592 / Virus Database: 3955/7656 - Release Date: 06/10/14
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|