To: | rtty@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules |
From: | Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com> |
Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:06:01 -0800 |
List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
Bill - I have wondered this same thing my self.I have a couple of amps and one of them is an old SB-200 which now on a good day will put out about 350 watts. What is the difference between throttling this amp back to 100 watts or someone using a transceiver that runs 200 or 400 watts. If an amp is illegal, a radio that runs 400 or 200 watts should be illegal. Like Mike said, 'Cheaters will cheat.' 73 Tom W7WHY On 2/24/2015 9:59 AM, Bill Turner wrote:Quoting from the NAQP rules: "Use of external amplifiers capable of more than 100 W output is not allowed." I've been curious about that rule for a long time and just now getting around to asking about it. If one has a high power amp and throttles it back to 100 W, what's the difference? Am I missing some subtlety here? I can see where some ops might prefer to let their transceiver loaf along and use an external amp to reach 100 W. Why would this be prohibited? This rule must have been inserted for a reason. Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty_______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules, Cheryl Whitlock |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules, wo4o - RiC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules, W0MU Mike Fatchett |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules, wo4o - RiC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |