RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] FT4JA performance

To: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] FT4JA performance
From: EA2RY <ea2ry@ea2ry.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:06:08 +0200
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I agree!!

     73's de Roberto
http://www.ea2ry.com
        ¯_(ツ)_/¯

> El 11 abr 2016, a las 20:33, Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com> escribió:
> 
> I think the FT4JA team ran one of the better DXpeditions we've seen.  10%
> RTTY QSOs is just one of many things they did right in my opinion.  I give
> them high marks for their entire operation.
> 
> However, I have to admit that I am not a fan of selecting a "DXpedition of
> the Year".  A lot of time, money and hard work go into a successful
> operation from a rare location like Juan de Nova or Heard Island.  Each
> operation has a unique set of challenges.  I find it impossible to select
> the "best" one.
> 
> The 10% RTTY QSO rate is exceptional compared to other rare DXpeditions of
> this magnitude.  In fact, it is the highest of any comparable DXpedition I
> recall.  Moreover, the FT4JA RTTY operator(s) demonstrated high competence
> whenever I monitored their activity.  Effectively running the tremendous
> RTTY pileups from such a location is extremely difficult.
> 
> I honestly don't know if a higher percentage of RTTY contacts should have
> been targeted or achieved by FT4JA.  There are many factors to consider.
> Each of us has our own interests and goals in working a DXpedition such as
> this.  It is not as simple as saying 1/3 of the contacts should be RTTY.
> Maybe 20% is a fair goal for the future, but I'm personally not convinced.
> 
> Heard Island made 4.5% of their QSOs on RTTY.  I think that should have been
> higher.  They clearly emphasized CW over both SSB and RTTY.  There is no way
> to know if this achieved a higher number of ATNO QSOs with Heard Island.
> Certainly, this strategy did not change the Unique percentage in the Clublog
> statistics as compared to FT4JA at their 75K QSO mark, nor other recent
> comparable DXpeditions.
> 
> Both FT4JA and VK0EK constrained their RTTY contacts to 4 and 3 bands
> respectively.  That helped to focus their RTTY operating time to supply a
> new mode rather than additional band-mode-slots.  I even question whether
> limiting to 2-3 bands would be worth the increase in ATNO RTTY QSOs.
> 
> The VK0EK DXA website capability was amazing.  Current band-mode operation
> was shown real-time.  The actual log rolled by real-time.  QSOs were
> confirmed within 1-2 minutes.  Within a few hours, QSOs were confirmed on
> LotW for those stations who donated at least $5, including those who sent an
> online donation during the operation (within 1-2 days).  That DXer benefit
> is unprecedented, especially from a location where the only Internet
> connection is via a very expensive sat phone system.  The Heard Island
> project was fortunate to find a donor of not only the equipment but 24x7 air
> time.  Couple this with the ARRL ability to process online DXCC LotW credits
> within 1-2 days, meant that a station could work VK0EK and have their DXCC
> record officially updated before the DXpedition went QRT.
> 
> I appreciate the time, money and effort that these teams (plus their donors
> and supporters) contributed for my enjoyment.
> 
> Ed W0YK
> ___________________________________________________________
> 
> Jim F2LZ wrote:
> 
> Any RTTY fan operator should vote for FT4JA as the DXpedition of the Year:
> 10010 RTTY QSOs that is 10% of the 100K Juan de Nova contacts.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>