RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence

To: RTTY@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence
From: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 11:21:12 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
A fine example of FUD, since neither the ARRL or FCC are changing 97.221 in any way, nor 
is it likely that any significant increase in interference will result with 
"new" technologies already having a means to prevent interference as part of 
their design.

Matthew Pitts
N8OHU


FUD?? No one said anything about 97.221, the olny thing being spread by 
proponents isn't FUD but rather
something more easily shoveled. How would Winlink react if I dumped a 10kHz 
wide OFDM signal on
the auto sub bands.

How's the ARDOP development coming? If this passes you'll be able to utilize 
all those wider versions,
got the LBT working on it yet?

Ron K0IDT

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>