RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Information please

To: RTTY Reflector <rtty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Information please
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 14:10:55 +0000
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)

On Fri, 26 May 2017 09:20:25 +0100, you wrote:

>You could think about using the other data modes. With low power and poor
>propagation, PSK can work a lot better than RTTY. 
>The ultimate move across to the dark side is JT65. I started using JT65
>about 10 days ago and have 60+ countries in the log, operating just a couple
>of hours a day.
>Very low power is all you need, but it's a horrible slow process with no
>skill required. My only motivation is to get to 100 DXCC then back to RTTY!
>John GW4SKA

REPLY:

Even better than JT65 is JT9.  A fraction of the bandwidth and
according to the author, about 2 dB better with weak signals. The
protocol is the same. Give it a try, you'll like it. 

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>