[SECC] W4AN on CQ cover

[ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net)]

I think the ARRL contests are run much better than CQ. They are timely with the 
results and mailing you your plaques/certificates. Plus they publish the 
results online for everyone to see.

It usually takes at least 3 years to get anything from CQ. Plus they refuse to
publish the results online because they want you to buy their magazine. Their 
plaques and certificates seem to be a lower quality of what the ARRL has.

Just my observation.....


                       73, Jeff

> 
> From: "Courtney Judd - K4WI" <k4wi@earthlink.net>
> Date: 2004/09/22 Wed PM 07:20:12 EDT
> To: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
> CC: SECC <secc@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover
> 
> I agree with you Dave 100%... CQWW is unlike any other and I support CQ
> 100%. If I had to pick between CQ and QST it would be CQ hands down..
> entered my first rtty contest last year and brought home a first place SO
> USA 10 mtrs in CQ rtty WPX 2004 qualified for a plaque but no sponsers but
> tickle me pink! 73's Cort K4WI
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>