Subject: | [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover |
---|---|
From: | w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald) |
Date: | Wed Sep 22 20:42:54 2004 |
I have to agree....CQ is hands down the better choice. I really hate to say it but.....IF I wasn't a LIFER with the league I wouldn't waste my money on a sub to QST. I have thought this for years, they need to seperate the magazine from the league membership. I think they would cut costs (not needing to publish so many mags) and get more members. Just my ten cents worth. Dan/W4NTI > [Original Message] > From: Courtney Judd - K4WI <k4wi@earthlink.net> > To: David Thompson <thompson@mindspring.com> > Cc: SECC <secc@contesting.com> > Date: 9/22/04 6:19:14 PM > Subject: Re: [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover > > I agree with you Dave 100%... CQWW is unlike any other and I support CQ > 100%. If I had to pick between CQ and QST it would be CQ hands down.. > entered my first rtty contest last year and brought home a first place SO > USA 10 mtrs in CQ rtty WPX 2004 qualified for a plaque but no sponsers but > tickle me pink! 73's Cort K4WI > > > _______________________________________________ > SECC mailing list > SECC@contesting.com > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [SECC] ant work this weekend, Rick Dougherty NQ4I |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover, Gary McConville |
Previous by Thread: | [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover, K4SB |
Next by Thread: | [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover, Gary McConville |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |