TRLog
[Top] [All Lists]

[TRLog] League accepted edited log...but??

Subject: [TRLog] League accepted edited log...but??
From: gbaron@sparc.isl.net (Gilbert Baron)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 11:54:19 -0600
Marion J. Henson wrote:
> 
> Might add that the ARRL official forms are available for downloading from
> their WEB site and their SUMMARY SHEET does provide spaces for insertion of
> CALL USED, PRECEDENCE, CHECK and SECTION.
> 

Might be a good enhancement to have a customized summary sheet. We are
lucky that contest comittees are not too fussy here.
On the other hand, probably not the most important enhancement that
could ever happpen? 


> At 03:12 PM 11/17/97 -0000, Len Revelle wrote:
> >My original post assumed that the info was supposed to be in the finished
> >ARRL log. I should have interpreted the ARRL response better but took it to
> >mean they didn't like the log output and I assumed it should have been
> >different (I'm a CT/NA convert and hadn't seen TR output before). For the
> >waste of band width spent on the subject, I apologize.
> >/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >|     Len Revelle     lenrev@wwa.com      |
> >|         N9IJ                 AMA 60055            |
> >////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Al Gritzmacher <ae2t@bigfoot.com>
> >To: Len Revelle <lenrev@wwa.com>; TR Reflector <trlog@contesting.com>
> >Date: Monday, November 17, 1997 6:58 AM
> >Subject: Re: [TRLog] League accepted edited log...but??
> >
> >
> >>At 04:34 AM 11/15/97 -0000, you wrote:
> >>>Tree, if the log.dat file does not contain my fixed exchange info (A N9IJ
> >66
> >>>IL) where does POST grab this info for insertion into the arrl log format?
> >>>I'd suspect I've not got this set and is causing the omission.
> >>>
> >>
> >>POST never has put this information in the "ARRL Format" log. My
> >>understanding of it is that he has attempted to keep it under 80 characters
> >>in width and has left out this redundant information to do so.
> >>
> >>Put your default exchange in your summary; the ARRL has always accepted it
> >>this way. (Despite what their rules seem to say!)
> >>
> >>I suspect that most problems with rejected logs are usually either
> >>editing/saving in a non-ascii format and encoding problems with
> >attachments,
> >>not the file data itself.
> >>
> >>73,
> >>
> >>Al AE2T
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html
> >>Submissions:              trlog@contesting.com
> >>Administrative requests:  trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
> >>Problems:                 owner-trlog@contesting.com
> >>Feature Wishlist:   http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html
> >>
> >
> >Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\Attach\smime1.p7s"
> >
> 
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html
> Submissions:              trlog@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-trlog@contesting.com
> Feature Wishlist:         http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html

-- 
Gil gbaron@sparc.isl.net 
Bailar es vivir
http://www.geocities.com/Yosemite/Trails/4168

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html
Submissions:              trlog@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-trlog@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist:         http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>