On 30 Nov 98 at 12:32, Bob wrote:
>>K7GT wrote:
>>As the rig can handle 19200 (as can
> >my main std logging program LOG-EQF), I was quite surprised that
> trlog
> >couldn't.
> >Grant Taylor K7GT Pleasanton/Livermore CA k7gt@qsl.net
> Hello, Grant. The big difference is that TR does everything withou
> using any interrupts (IRQ's). That is the max baud rate with no IRQ
> intervention.
> KF9YH
I guess a good follow-up would be: Is the operation impaired by the
low baud rate? For me the answer is no, but what about the ops doing
the 2-radio thing with the high-powered rigs and computers? I would
suspect that 4800 is more than sufficient, but I'll leave that to the
experts.
--scott
--
Scott A. Stembaugh - Project Administrator
scott@purdue.edu (765)494-3308 Fax: (765)496-1380
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html
Submissions: trlog@contesting.com
Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-trlog@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist: http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html
|