| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] TenTec for 160M -Reply |
| From: | PEPLASTERS@mail.rkd.snds.com (Paul Plasters) |
| Date: | Thu, 07 May 1998 06:55:00 -0500 |
What antenna does work for 160, that a city dweller can erect? Say on
a 50 by 100 lot.
o~
_[-/)_
(_)\/\(=)-ooo...
Ride to live-Live to ride
"peplasters@rockford.com"
Ask me about an indoor air polution control device!
>>> Ronald D Rossi <rrossi%btv.ibm.com@internet.rkd.snds.com>
05/06/98 02:35pm >>>
>
Empirically only a problem if you have a descent antenna on 160m. I find
that there are many more stations I can hear than I can work. I have tried
a short top loaded vertical w/ 6 radial (pretty poor) and an 80m dipole
matched for 160 fed with 450 Ohm line (even worse).
TT Omni-D Series B
>
> Clark
> WA3JPG
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
> Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Ten Tec Net This Sunday, RICHARD ANDREN |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] TenTec for 160M -Reply, Steve Ellington |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] TenTec for 160M, Steve Ellington |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] TenTec for 160M -Reply, Steve Ellington |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |