TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] TenTec for 160M -Reply

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] TenTec for 160M -Reply
From: N4NT@bnoc.net (Michael O. Hyder)
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 11:12:03 -0400
Actually that would be a half wave, wouldn't it, Steve.  Probably ought
to extend it a bit and get five-eights wavelength.
Regards,  Mike           N4NT@bnoc.net
====================================
     Michael O. Hyder
     401 E Holston Ave
     Johnson City  TN  37601-4009
     (423) 232-6453
====================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Ellington <n4lq@iglou.com>
To: Paul Plasters <PEPLASTERS@mail.rkd.snds.com>
Cc: rrossi@btv.ibm.com <rrossi@btv.ibm.com>; turner@safety.ics.uci.edu
<turner@safety.ics.uci.edu>; tentec@contesting.com
<tentec@contesting.com>; johnc@geekopolis.com <johnc@geekopolis.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thursday, May 07, 1998 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec for 160M -Reply


>> What antenna does work for 160, that a city dweller can erect?  Say
on
>> a 50 by 100 lot.
>>
>
>A 260ft vertical should fit nicely. Not enough room for a good ground
>system though. You'll have to compromise on that part.
>
>Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>Steve Ellington N4LQ@IGLOU.COM  Louisville, Ky
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
>Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>