Robert wrote:
>
> After reading all of this, what is the TenTec response... Surely they see
> (as I have in just these few messages) that there is an obvious preference,
> on this reflector, for the INRAD filters. Why doesn't TenTec offer these
> filters under the TenTec brand name? Just curious...
I can't speak for Ten Tec, but I fail to see how the preferences of a
few (or a few dozen, for that matter) can be equated as the universal
preference of the many hundreds or thousands of satisfied Omni 6 owners
who utilize stock TT filters. I, for one, am satisfied with the
performance of my various TT filters and the steep skirt selectivity
exhibited, which, I might add, seems to far exceed what I've seen in
Kenwood and Icom rigs I've owned. That's not to say I wouldn't entertain
considering Inrad filters in the future. But, so far, I feel no need as
a CW and SSB operator, to change out my TT filters. I suspect the silent
majority who simply follow this reflector, but who choose not to
respond, may feel the same way. My 2.1 cents, if you will.
Vince/K7NA
"From the Surf to the Sewer, to ALL of Southern California"
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|